Illinois Child Welfare Employee License (CWEL) Practice Test

1 / 400

Which case requires DCFS to protect children from foreseeable harm and provide adequate health care and services?

Burgos V. Suter

Aristotle P V. McDonald

Bates V. McDonald

BH V. McDonald

In the context of Illinois Child Welfare, the case BH v. McDonald is significant as it requires the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) to protect children from foreseeable harm and ensure that they receive adequate health care and services. This case emphasizes the responsibility of DCFS to safeguard the well-being of children in its care and highlights the importance of providing necessary support and services to ensure their safety and welfare. The other options do not specifically address the same legal requirements and implications for DCFS as the BH v. McDonald case does.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta
Next Question
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy